Birdwatch Note
2025-02-02 00:09:17 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
夫婦別姓は日本以外の全ての国で導入されている世界的に当たり前のことです。 「世界で日本だけ」の夫婦同姓 四半世紀前に分岐点 https://www.asahi.com/articles/ASP6R3GTXP6QUTIL075.html 日本でも6割の人が賛成していて賛成派が多数派なのが事実です。 選択的夫婦別姓は賛成59% 共同調査、内閣支持横ばい：日本経済新聞 https://www.nikkei.com/article/DGXZQOUA262B80W5A120C2000000/ 在日の出自を隠すために考えだされたものというのは根拠の無い反対派のデマです。
Written by D7A3BA93AB464C3619BF19A06DEEEC6CF1E9AFAE70B90D9D52109AB3CDAB4E0E
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1885466094829494600
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1885842891278594479
- noteId - 1885842891278594479
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - D7A3BA93AB464C3619BF19A06DEEEC6CF1E9AFAE70B90D9D52109AB3CDAB4E0E
- createdAtMillis - 1738454957205
- tweetId - 1885466094829494600
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- 夫婦別姓は日本以外の全ての国で導入されている世界的に当たり前のことです。 「世界で日本だけ」の夫婦同姓 四半世紀前に分岐点 https://www.asahi.com/articles/ASP6R3GTXP6QUTIL075.html 日本でも6割の人が賛成していて賛成派が多数派なのが事実です。 選択的夫婦別姓は賛成59% 共同調査、内閣支持横ばい：日本経済新聞 https://www.nikkei.com/article/DGXZQOUA262B80W5A120C2000000/ 在日の出自を隠すために考えだされたものというのは根拠の無い反対派のデマです。
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2025-02-02 09:26:29 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-02 09:04:00 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-02 07:33:06 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-02 07:28:22 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-02 07:00:50 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-02 05:13:32 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-02 04:22:21 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-02 00:32:35 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-02 00:06:50 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-01 23:05:41 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-01 22:45:52 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-01 20:26:18 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-01 18:53:24 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-01 18:50:21 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-01 18:49:02 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-01 18:44:04 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-01 18:16:31 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-01 18:11:13 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-02 22:52:30 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-02 19:13:57 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-02 19:07:03 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-02 16:38:19 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-02 16:33:54 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-02 16:22:15 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-02 11:41:04 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-02 05:05:58 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-01 19:01:38 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-01 18:42:21 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-02 00:32:51 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-01 20:36:30 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-01 20:14:17 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-01 19:52:47 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-01 19:36:45 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-01 19:35:08 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-01 19:34:41 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-01 19:27:04 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-01 19:10:43 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-02 16:52:35 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-02 04:35:44 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-01 21:58:27 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-01 18:37:39 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-07 18:37:49 -0600 | Rating Details |