Birdwatch Note
2025-02-01 13:50:36 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN -- this post is fundamentally an opinion. Comments should be posted as, well, comments. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subjectivity_and_objectivity_(philosophy)
Written by D0BAC971803F86F4090CA218ECCFD43E7188CE654AF5479910E7BDF0A228D9B8
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1885238689200046516
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1885687197657108564
- noteId - 1885687197657108564
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - D0BAC971803F86F4090CA218ECCFD43E7188CE654AF5479910E7BDF0A228D9B8
- createdAtMillis - 1738417836952
- tweetId - 1885238689200046516
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- NNN -- this post is fundamentally an opinion. Comments should be posted as, well, comments. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subjectivity_and_objectivity_(philosophy)
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2025-02-02 00:08:31 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-01 10:44:51 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-01 08:10:27 -0600 | Rating Details |