Birdwatch Note
2025-02-01 09:44:40 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
The underdeveloped Manhattan island was traded by the Dutch to the British empire in 1667. The trade was in exchange for the island Run in Indonesia which had valuable production of nutmeg. The nutmeg spice was as valuable as gold back then. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/why-banda-islands-were-once-more-valuable-manhattan-n787006?utm_source=perplexity https://www.atlasobscura.com/articles/island-traded-for-manhattan?utm_source=perplexity
Written by E6234749A0964A311C0397FC72F9E9C6E2CC4AD4991966E055DB448788E0BA94
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1885328185740390743
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1885625306293113228
- noteId - 1885625306293113228
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - E6234749A0964A311C0397FC72F9E9C6E2CC4AD4991966E055DB448788E0BA94
- createdAtMillis - 1738403080901
- tweetId - 1885328185740390743
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- The underdeveloped Manhattan island was traded by the Dutch to the British empire in 1667. The trade was in exchange for the island Run in Indonesia which had valuable production of nutmeg. The nutmeg spice was as valuable as gold back then. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/why-banda-islands-were-once-more-valuable-manhattan-n787006?utm_source=perplexity https://www.atlasobscura.com/articles/island-traded-for-manhattan?utm_source=perplexity
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2025-02-02 06:55:23 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-02 03:51:29 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-02 01:52:18 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-01 19:22:16 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-01 17:07:08 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-01 15:18:08 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-01 13:58:16 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-01 13:35:37 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-01 10:48:59 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-01 08:56:47 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-01 08:40:45 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-01 08:34:31 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-01 08:08:35 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-01 05:37:33 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-01 05:12:15 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-01 05:01:56 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-01 04:53:11 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-01 04:15:39 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-02 04:34:42 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-02 01:54:32 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-02 00:22:34 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-02 00:21:44 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-01 19:30:40 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-01 15:23:10 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-01 10:52:41 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-01 10:41:49 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-01 10:08:35 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-01 09:42:33 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-01 08:40:05 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-01 06:36:18 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-02 04:00:51 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-01 19:23:18 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-01 18:52:40 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-01 09:36:49 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-01 09:34:28 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-01 08:56:43 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-01 06:14:28 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-01 05:26:24 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-01 04:38:39 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-01 20:08:33 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-01 16:35:27 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-01 11:15:14 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-01 09:02:36 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-01 08:34:09 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-01 07:43:17 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-01 06:54:51 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-01 06:16:18 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-01 06:16:10 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-01 06:05:53 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-01 05:20:09 -0600 | Rating Details |