Birdwatch Note
2025-02-01 01:33:19 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
Context: The agency made its new assessment with “low confidence,” which means the intelligence behind it is fragmentary and incomplete. A CIA spokeswoman said the other theory remains plausible. https://www.nytimes.com/2025/01/25/us/politics/cia-covid-lab-leak.html Intel agencies are divided on covid origins, most favoring zoonic, not lab https://www.dni.gov/files/ODNI/documents/assessments/Report-on-Potential-Links-Between-the-Wuhan-Institute-of-Virology-and-the-Origins-of-COVID-19-20230623.pdf
Written by 2A6B630D0AEA2ACC36E2189A989B042C8F44788D5C6526EF4EAC8856A79A73D8
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1885412439425982648
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1885501653429764414
- noteId - 1885501653429764414
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 2A6B630D0AEA2ACC36E2189A989B042C8F44788D5C6526EF4EAC8856A79A73D8
- createdAtMillis - 1738373599761
- tweetId - 1885412439425982648
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Context: The agency made its new assessment with “low confidence,” which means the intelligence behind it is fragmentary and incomplete. A CIA spokeswoman said the other theory remains plausible. https://www.nytimes.com/2025/01/25/us/politics/cia-covid-lab-leak.html Intel agencies are divided on covid origins, most favoring zoonic, not lab https://www.dni.gov/files/ODNI/documents/assessments/Report-on-Potential-Links-Between-the-Wuhan-Institute-of-Virology-and-the-Origins-of-COVID-19-20230623.pdf
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2025-02-02 05:57:05 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-01 18:37:08 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-01 15:35:54 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-01 13:53:46 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-01 12:46:58 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-01 09:56:57 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-01 09:03:29 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-01 09:01:05 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-01 08:28:45 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-01 07:39:04 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-01 06:16:55 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-01 06:09:11 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-01 04:34:36 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-01 03:51:17 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-01 03:21:28 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-01 02:13:52 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-01 01:42:19 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-01 01:31:04 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-01 01:16:21 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-31 23:51:18 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-31 23:35:40 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-31 23:02:11 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-31 22:36:58 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-31 21:34:18 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-31 21:19:47 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-31 20:31:19 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-31 20:28:02 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-31 19:58:38 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-31 19:36:41 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-01 09:07:54 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-01 05:30:43 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-01 04:26:19 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-01 02:56:37 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-01 01:40:45 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-31 23:56:26 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-31 23:07:00 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-31 22:31:55 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-31 20:52:58 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-31 20:25:37 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-31 19:58:37 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-01 21:18:31 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-01 15:15:37 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-01 10:58:25 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-01 10:35:14 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-01 06:04:57 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-01 04:54:52 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-01 03:42:14 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-31 21:52:46 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-31 21:17:28 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-31 20:29:18 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-01 18:32:18 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-01 14:58:51 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-01 14:12:32 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-01 13:38:29 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-01 08:26:49 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-01 07:16:53 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-01 06:42:10 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-01 05:08:23 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-01 05:03:50 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-01 03:13:16 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-01 03:00:16 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-01 02:20:56 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-01 01:44:44 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-31 22:15:05 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-31 21:14:21 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-31 20:31:27 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-31 19:49:35 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-31 19:35:13 -0600 | Rating Details |