Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2025-01-30 18:08:50 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

Brian Hooker's autism study was retracted for methodological flaws. His developmental delays study did not control for differences between the groups of unvaccinated and vaccinated children. https://t.co/JV0DuDv1gx https://t.co/TZ0yUWpBhz Anthony Mawson's study was retracted for methodological flaws twice https://t.co/nmdByIWLrW

Written by 44CBCBA53B0A20480E324577AE6E5A82B4309B3A2A33F66BE8E04E3EF96B7F2D
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1884992854222594153

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1885027406844748174
  • noteId - 1885027406844748174
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 44CBCBA53B0A20480E324577AE6E5A82B4309B3A2A33F66BE8E04E3EF96B7F2D
  • createdAtMillis - 1738260530564
  • tweetId - 1884992854222594153
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Brian Hooker's autism study was retracted for methodological flaws. His developmental delays study did not control for differences between the groups of unvaccinated and vaccinated children. https://t.co/JV0DuDv1gx https://t.co/TZ0yUWpBhz Anthony Mawson's study was retracted for methodological flaws twice https://t.co/nmdByIWLrW

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2025-01-31 10:56:59 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-31 09:11:32 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-31 09:01:05 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-31 08:12:51 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-31 08:02:09 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-31 07:18:20 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-31 01:15:04 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-31 00:25:11 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-30 23:22:19 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-30 21:50:38 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-30 19:23:26 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-30 18:10:41 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-30 17:55:17 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-30 17:52:51 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-30 14:28:15 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-30 14:19:55 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-30 14:18:15 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-30 13:32:24 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-30 13:05:51 -0600 Rating Details
2025-02-01 16:43:06 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-31 12:05:52 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-31 09:52:22 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-31 05:56:59 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-30 19:28:49 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-30 18:39:17 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-30 18:39:03 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-30 14:54:03 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-31 14:25:30 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-31 09:12:14 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-31 00:25:11 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-31 00:03:17 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-30 19:19:28 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-30 15:29:24 -0600 Rating Details
2025-02-13 13:01:02 -0600 Rating Details