Birdwatch Note
2025-01-25 16:16:38 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
Misleading and not new. For Wiles’s comments, Daily Mail cited an Axios article from 6 Jan 2025. The Axios article never mentioned Elon Musk. https://web.archive.org/web/20250125141814/https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14323973/Donald-Trump-Susie-Wiles-chief-staff-takedown-Elon-Musk.html https://web.archive.org/web/20250125033528/https://www.axios.com/2025/01/06/axios-interview-susie-wiles-trump Daily Mail cited its own article to claim Elon wouldn’t have a West Wing office despite that article never making the claim. https://web.archive.org/web/20241231060923mp_/https://www.dailymail.co.uk/galleries/article-13760961/Elon-Musk-responds-Trumps-vow-step-White-House-role.html
Written by CF208784B6CD29B59CE52AA82CC6069C773559C97E3EBF3DA897B6B871BB8A46
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1883157979324911890
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1883187231143416235
- noteId - 1883187231143416235
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - CF208784B6CD29B59CE52AA82CC6069C773559C97E3EBF3DA897B6B871BB8A46
- createdAtMillis - 1737821798488
- tweetId - 1883157979324911890
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 1
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Misleading and not new. For Wiles’s comments, Daily Mail cited an Axios article from 6 Jan 2025. The Axios article never mentioned Elon Musk. https://web.archive.org/web/20250125141814/https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14323973/Donald-Trump-Susie-Wiles-chief-staff-takedown-Elon-Musk.html https://web.archive.org/web/20250125033528/https://www.axios.com/2025/01/06/axios-interview-susie-wiles-trump Daily Mail cited its own article to claim Elon wouldn’t have a West Wing office despite that article never making the claim. https://web.archive.org/web/20241231060923mp_/https://www.dailymail.co.uk/galleries/article-13760961/Elon-Musk-responds-Trumps-vow-step-White-House-role.html
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2025-01-26 10:20:29 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-26 08:21:15 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-26 08:15:36 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-26 08:14:50 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-26 07:45:28 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-26 07:36:53 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-26 05:32:19 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-26 04:32:43 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-26 03:42:25 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-26 01:30:29 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-26 01:23:01 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-25 22:34:13 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-25 22:00:17 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-25 21:54:13 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-25 21:37:21 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-25 21:31:18 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-25 21:23:56 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-25 21:09:24 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-25 20:59:01 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-25 20:47:55 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-25 20:29:39 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-25 19:48:00 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-25 19:41:25 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-25 19:26:51 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-25 18:51:33 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-25 18:30:40 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-25 18:27:50 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-25 18:18:51 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-25 18:06:02 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-25 17:46:49 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-25 17:27:28 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-25 17:18:51 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-25 17:07:05 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-25 17:03:20 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-25 17:01:01 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-25 16:39:52 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-25 16:14:28 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-25 16:10:15 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-25 16:09:39 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-25 15:59:49 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-25 15:40:39 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-25 15:28:54 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-25 15:11:28 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-25 14:49:38 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-25 14:47:37 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-25 14:35:05 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-25 14:24:01 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-25 13:58:52 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-25 13:54:08 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-25 13:49:52 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-25 13:44:26 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-25 13:41:37 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-25 13:40:31 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-25 13:28:26 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-25 13:23:55 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-25 13:19:00 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-25 13:15:47 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-25 13:14:49 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-25 12:57:10 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-25 12:53:50 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-25 12:50:56 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-25 12:44:43 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-25 12:15:56 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-25 11:54:07 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-25 11:38:58 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-25 11:13:11 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-25 11:10:42 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-25 10:26:49 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-26 19:12:48 -0600 | Rating Details |