Birdwatch Note
2025-01-24 17:48:07 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
Jayden Daniels didn’t have 9 receptions. Bo Nix didn’t have 12 receptions. Those are their interception numbers. Whoever made the graphic should have their Photoshop privileges revoked. https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/D/DaniJa02.htm
Written by 428475E59D3766C70918C594E9E2CCF215E258913B723FB9A028DA308AE8BA54
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1882493126495092743
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1882847864985936218
- noteId - 1882847864985936218
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 428475E59D3766C70918C594E9E2CCF215E258913B723FB9A028DA308AE8BA54
- createdAtMillis - 1737740887291
- tweetId - 1882493126495092743
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Jayden Daniels didn’t have 9 receptions. Bo Nix didn’t have 12 receptions. Those are their interception numbers. Whoever made the graphic should have their Photoshop privileges revoked. https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/D/DaniJa02.htm
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2025-01-24 17:05:05 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-24 15:50:57 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-24 15:09:05 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-24 14:27:40 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-24 13:30:48 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-24 13:24:18 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-24 13:24:05 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-24 13:13:29 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-24 13:12:44 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-24 13:01:27 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-24 12:15:08 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-24 12:10:38 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-24 12:06:47 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-24 11:56:55 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-25 10:18:47 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-24 23:27:15 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-24 18:53:05 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-24 17:59:00 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-24 16:47:51 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-24 15:23:11 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-24 13:02:25 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-24 11:50:56 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-24 13:29:48 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-24 13:18:18 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-24 13:05:13 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-24 18:42:07 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-24 17:49:49 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-24 17:40:22 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-24 15:19:42 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-24 15:05:38 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-24 13:34:40 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-24 13:09:14 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-24 12:31:57 -0600 | Rating Details |