Birdwatch Note
2025-01-23 19:26:21 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
A manchete induz o leitor a acreditar que o assunto seria discutido no STF o que pode até não ser verdade. Mas o correto seria ministros do STF nem sequer tocarem nesse assunto visto que não é da competência de ministros do STF se manifestarem fora dos autos. https://legis.senado.leg.br/sdleg-getter/documento?dm=3821795&disposition=inline
Written by 4652A20EE0825312AC3C325901EAB605DC9685C22E907BE8EA82C6682887BA44
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1882420263536521598
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1882510199136637105
- noteId - 1882510199136637105
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 4652A20EE0825312AC3C325901EAB605DC9685C22E907BE8EA82C6682887BA44
- createdAtMillis - 1737660381480
- tweetId - 1882420263536521598
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- A manchete induz o leitor a acreditar que o assunto seria discutido no STF o que pode até não ser verdade. Mas o correto seria ministros do STF nem sequer tocarem nesse assunto visto que não é da competência de ministros do STF se manifestarem fora dos autos. https://legis.senado.leg.br/sdleg-getter/documento?dm=3821795&disposition=inline
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2025-01-24 18:18:09 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-24 05:59:53 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-24 05:08:17 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-24 01:38:16 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-23 20:55:08 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-23 20:31:52 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-23 19:42:47 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-23 16:56:12 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-23 16:19:51 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-23 14:50:20 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-23 14:34:19 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-23 14:25:02 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-23 13:51:38 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-24 06:06:09 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-24 04:40:28 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-24 03:24:59 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-23 17:05:09 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-23 15:47:51 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-23 14:06:40 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-23 14:06:37 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-23 13:57:48 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-05 12:01:57 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-23 21:12:40 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-23 20:29:23 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-23 18:16:58 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-23 17:56:35 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-23 17:17:00 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-23 17:12:13 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-23 16:55:50 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-23 14:58:20 -0600 | Rating Details |