Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2025-01-15 18:05:05 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

El Fiscal General del Estado está imputado en una instrucción por haber revelado información procesal confidencial de un acusado.Hay indicios de borrado de pruebas En este caso,González Amador es quien no estuvo amparado por la ley y el FGE quien podría haber cometido el delito https://noticias.juridicas.com/actualidad/noticias/19842-el-juez-hurtado-cita-como-investigados-al-fiscal-general-del-estado-y-a-la-fiscal-provincial-de-madrid/

Written by 8961290D358AB3973AC1D239532D2678C3CA7BDF2C49B22ADCDF57ABF773C396
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1879507015363633191

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1879590645767041481
  • noteId - 1879590645767041481
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 8961290D358AB3973AC1D239532D2678C3CA7BDF2C49B22ADCDF57ABF773C396
  • createdAtMillis - 1736964305714
  • tweetId - 1879507015363633191
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • El Fiscal General del Estado está imputado en una instrucción por haber revelado información procesal confidencial de un acusado.Hay indicios de borrado de pruebas En este caso,González Amador es quien no estuvo amparado por la ley y el FGE quien podría haber cometido el delito https://noticias.juridicas.com/actualidad/noticias/19842-el-juez-hurtado-cita-como-investigados-al-fiscal-general-del-estado-y-a-la-fiscal-provincial-de-madrid/

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2025-01-16 09:12:39 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-16 09:05:10 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-16 08:48:04 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-16 04:56:38 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-16 00:38:25 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-15 20:09:27 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-15 16:02:39 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-15 13:16:53 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-16 07:36:07 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-16 02:17:07 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-15 18:36:13 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-15 15:09:24 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-16 05:29:41 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-16 02:34:12 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-15 14:59:26 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-16 13:18:58 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-16 08:26:28 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-16 03:07:34 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-16 02:56:52 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-16 02:01:18 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-15 15:46:10 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-15 15:41:22 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-15 14:57:47 -0600 Rating Details