Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2025-01-13 22:49:12 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

NNN the report cited in the note does not say what the note claims, it says the paucity of current data makes it impossible to say whether ethnicity is significant in offending rates.

Written by 98CC88178B745A94E7939701D82F004A71A7427464E0FF773320AF135D16A41E
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1878726800144286073

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1878937369174508024
  • noteId - 1878937369174508024
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 98CC88178B745A94E7939701D82F004A71A7427464E0FF773320AF135D16A41E
  • createdAtMillis - 1736808552436
  • tweetId - 1878726800144286073
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 0
  • summary
    • NNN the report cited in the note does not say what the note claims, it says the paucity of current data makes it impossible to say whether ethnicity is significant in offending rates.

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2025-01-14 05:40:46 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-13 21:19:26 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-13 18:07:14 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-14 17:14:42 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-13 17:22:54 -0600 Rating Details