Birdwatch Note
2025-01-10 14:30:45 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
Ce scandale n'est pas ancien, puisque les députés britanniques viennent de refuser l'ouverture d'une nouvelle enquête sur les viols de masse par des gangs pakistanais. De plus, ce n'est pas Elon Musk qui a relancé le débat, mais la presse britanniques il y a quelques jours. https://x.com/24hPujadas/status/1876320027709776027
Written by 6A93611F3E29E5AD9F019E6C59F4B98D64B7AC2615D3052BCBB5DD4BCC00F7D7
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1877720877694914971
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1877724767593116158
- noteId - 1877724767593116158
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 6A93611F3E29E5AD9F019E6C59F4B98D64B7AC2615D3052BCBB5DD4BCC00F7D7
- createdAtMillis - 1736519445691
- tweetId - 1877720877694914971
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Ce scandale n'est pas ancien, puisque les députés britanniques viennent de refuser l'ouverture d'une nouvelle enquête sur les viols de masse par des gangs pakistanais. De plus, ce n'est pas Elon Musk qui a relancé le débat, mais la presse britanniques il y a quelques jours. https://x.com/24hPujadas/status/1876320027709776027
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2025-01-10 13:17:10 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-10 12:51:10 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-10 12:36:48 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-10 11:26:09 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-10 11:05:06 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-10 09:34:28 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-10 09:02:39 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-12 01:39:06 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-11 20:47:12 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-11 14:03:19 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-11 09:03:40 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-12 23:49:52 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-11 05:49:31 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-10 13:28:30 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-10 12:54:14 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-10 12:36:52 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-10 11:27:57 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-10 08:52:52 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-10 08:48:52 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-10 13:12:26 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-10 13:00:39 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-10 12:58:52 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-10 11:34:43 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-10 09:53:26 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-10 08:33:28 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-11 05:35:43 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-10 13:26:41 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-10 12:55:22 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-10 12:31:41 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-10 12:09:40 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-10 09:51:05 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-10 09:47:01 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-10 08:58:38 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-10 08:54:08 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-14 07:02:19 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-12 04:00:29 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-10 12:06:06 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-10 11:09:55 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-10 09:25:37 -0600 | Rating Details |