Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2025-01-10 04:49:06 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

NNN The proposed note says Gibson’s experience is baseless, which is easily verifiably false. It also implies one medicine can’t have different side effects or severity in different people, which is ludicrous. https://www.science.org/content/article/very-very-bad-look-remdesivir-first-fda-approved-covid-19-drug

Written by 1303E5018D829FD7242E676513140391EA7B5782749F9031CB0658FF1C74D82F
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1877527505919173081

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1877578389902573845
  • noteId - 1877578389902573845
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 1303E5018D829FD7242E676513140391EA7B5782749F9031CB0658FF1C74D82F
  • createdAtMillis - 1736484546530
  • tweetId - 1877527505919173081
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • NNN The proposed note says Gibson’s experience is baseless, which is easily verifiably false. It also implies one medicine can’t have different side effects or severity in different people, which is ludicrous. https://www.science.org/content/article/very-very-bad-look-remdesivir-first-fda-approved-covid-19-drug

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2025-01-10 18:12:18 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-10 17:46:28 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-10 14:40:50 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-10 13:31:03 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-10 12:25:15 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-10 08:59:08 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-10 05:25:06 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-10 04:31:49 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-10 03:19:28 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-10 02:25:40 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-10 01:26:43 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-10 01:06:44 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-10 00:53:01 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-10 00:25:37 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-09 23:28:02 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-09 23:12:24 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-10 16:41:23 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-10 13:44:21 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-10 10:14:56 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-10 05:47:04 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-10 04:07:13 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-10 03:10:00 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-10 02:41:59 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-14 20:29:06 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-10 22:14:43 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-10 04:33:05 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-10 03:25:33 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-10 15:10:05 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-10 13:57:30 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-10 11:37:19 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-10 10:36:35 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-10 01:47:04 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-09 23:47:01 -0600 Rating Details