Birdwatch Note
2025-01-09 16:26:26 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
Matt Walsh did not claim that the movie "should" have been made with AI, he said that the movie "could" have been made with AI, meaning he sees it as indistinguishable from AI. Walsh is still wrong however as the movie is mostly adapting a story that predates generative AI. https://youtu.be/-NAp8RNvtRE?t=383
Written by DEF88EF4AA9B3EB22582309C0C297EFFE62DE165B10D921DFB2BCE836977A712
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1876848262633672835
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1877391490110079307
- noteId - 1877391490110079307
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - DEF88EF4AA9B3EB22582309C0C297EFFE62DE165B10D921DFB2BCE836977A712
- createdAtMillis - 1736439986146
- tweetId - 1876848262633672835
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Matt Walsh did not claim that the movie "should" have been made with AI, he said that the movie "could" have been made with AI, meaning he sees it as indistinguishable from AI. Walsh is still wrong however as the movie is mostly adapting a story that predates generative AI. https://youtu.be/-NAp8RNvtRE?t=383
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2025-01-09 23:35:15 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-09 20:03:29 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-09 19:13:55 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-09 18:34:37 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-09 13:56:05 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-09 13:27:08 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-09 11:57:16 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-09 11:53:58 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-09 11:43:58 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-09 11:39:56 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-09 10:42:35 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-11 18:27:22 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-10 10:33:42 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-09 20:58:54 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-09 20:47:52 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-09 18:10:21 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-09 16:24:09 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-09 19:17:24 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-09 12:46:57 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-09 12:17:18 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-09 11:13:48 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-14 13:49:45 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-09 16:43:19 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-09 16:12:53 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-09 14:32:03 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-09 13:49:07 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-09 11:15:20 -0600 | Rating Details |