Birdwatch Note
2025-01-09 14:25:37 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
このポストの内容には根拠がありません。 また、このアカウントの他のポストも、ほとんどが本人の思い込み推測で成り立っていることに注意が必要です。 週刊誌とは言え、選手の生の声を拾った記事に一定の信憑性はあります。 https://www.news-postseven.com/archives/20221116_1812971.html?DETAIL
Written by E4C5C167401E23A05473186749C98A732BEB706CAF82445027B519373AA02091
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1876992098794119375
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1877361086795755871
- noteId - 1877361086795755871
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - E4C5C167401E23A05473186749C98A732BEB706CAF82445027B519373AA02091
- createdAtMillis - 1736432737431
- tweetId - 1876992098794119375
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- このポストの内容には根拠がありません。 また、このアカウントの他のポストも、ほとんどが本人の思い込み推測で成り立っていることに注意が必要です。 週刊誌とは言え、選手の生の声を拾った記事に一定の信憑性はあります。 https://www.news-postseven.com/archives/20221116_1812971.html?DETAIL
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2025-01-09 16:45:54 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-09 10:15:58 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-09 08:38:09 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-09 09:10:52 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-09 08:36:49 -0600 | Rating Details |