Birdwatch Note
2025-01-06 16:19:50 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
Fake graph from a blog post https://geocraft.com/WVFossils/Carboniferous_climate.html The source cited Berner et al 2001 refutes the claim there is "no correlation" "There is indeed a correlation between CO2 and paleotemperature" https://ajsonline.org/article/61570-geocarb-iii-a-revised-model-of-atmospheric-co-2-over-phanerozoic-time The temperature plots are wrong https://x.com/Ceist8/status/1693061866921275718 Co2 is correlated to temperature https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1342937X18302818 https://www.climate.gov/news-features/understanding-climate/climate-change-atmospheric-carbon-dioxide
Written by 2A6B630D0AEA2ACC36E2189A989B042C8F44788D5C6526EF4EAC8856A79A73D8
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1876282184715407496
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1876302667766800443
- noteId - 1876302667766800443
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 2A6B630D0AEA2ACC36E2189A989B042C8F44788D5C6526EF4EAC8856A79A73D8
- createdAtMillis - 1736180390670
- tweetId - 1876282184715407496
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Fake graph from a blog post https://geocraft.com/WVFossils/Carboniferous_climate.html The source cited Berner et al 2001 refutes the claim there is "no correlation" "There is indeed a correlation between CO2 and paleotemperature" https://ajsonline.org/article/61570-geocarb-iii-a-revised-model-of-atmospheric-co-2-over-phanerozoic-time The temperature plots are wrong https://x.com/Ceist8/status/1693061866921275718 Co2 is correlated to temperature https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1342937X18302818 https://www.climate.gov/news-features/understanding-climate/climate-change-atmospheric-carbon-dioxide
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2025-01-06 16:49:46 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-06 15:13:56 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-06 14:09:27 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-06 14:08:29 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-06 14:00:51 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-06 13:45:03 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-06 13:16:33 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-06 13:03:56 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-06 12:57:28 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-06 12:51:50 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-06 11:15:06 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-06 11:10:13 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-06 11:08:45 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-06 10:54:07 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-06 10:48:09 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-06 10:47:04 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-06 10:31:08 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-06 10:27:15 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-06 10:22:27 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-07 21:11:08 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-07 05:28:22 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-07 02:53:09 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-07 01:30:59 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-06 12:22:29 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-06 11:54:02 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-06 11:32:41 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-06 11:25:21 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-06 10:47:01 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-06 10:32:40 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-06 10:22:51 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-07 04:15:14 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-06 14:43:20 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-06 13:42:22 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-06 13:13:28 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-06 12:03:33 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-06 11:49:20 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-06 11:24:26 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-06 11:11:23 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-06 11:02:56 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-06 11:00:28 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-06 10:43:09 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-06 10:42:15 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-06 10:40:43 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-31 05:54:20 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-07 17:11:10 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-06 17:15:08 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-06 11:52:23 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-06 11:49:15 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-06 11:40:58 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-06 11:21:02 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-06 11:00:43 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-06 10:51:01 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-07 04:35:12 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-07 03:21:43 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-06 15:38:03 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-06 15:13:56 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-06 15:04:21 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-06 13:59:51 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-06 13:21:38 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-06 13:09:23 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-06 12:19:58 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-06 11:14:12 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-06 11:13:45 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-06 11:13:26 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-06 10:54:52 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-02-16 12:59:20 -0600 | Rating Details |