Birdwatch Note
2025-01-05 16:01:42 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN- Why are we community noting this random guy's reply, especially when it's clearly only an opinion? Argue in the replies, don't abuse CN
Written by F9DF58176084974E371DD0DF85FCB47B45E3F133229FD7E6A0E97149F22F9437
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1875585778140770336
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1875935714879197320
- noteId - 1875935714879197320
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - F9DF58176084974E371DD0DF85FCB47B45E3F133229FD7E6A0E97149F22F9437
- createdAtMillis - 1736092902284
- tweetId - 1875585778140770336
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- NNN- Why are we community noting this random guy's reply, especially when it's clearly only an opinion? Argue in the replies, don't abuse CN
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2025-01-06 07:51:07 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2025-01-06 08:45:04 -0600 | Rating Details |