Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2025-01-05 16:01:42 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

NNN- Why are we community noting this random guy's reply, especially when it's clearly only an opinion? Argue in the replies, don't abuse CN

Written by F9DF58176084974E371DD0DF85FCB47B45E3F133229FD7E6A0E97149F22F9437
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1875585778140770336

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1875935714879197320
  • noteId - 1875935714879197320
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - F9DF58176084974E371DD0DF85FCB47B45E3F133229FD7E6A0E97149F22F9437
  • createdAtMillis - 1736092902284
  • tweetId - 1875585778140770336
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
  • trustworthySources - 0
  • summary
    • NNN- Why are we community noting this random guy's reply, especially when it's clearly only an opinion? Argue in the replies, don't abuse CN

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2025-01-06 07:51:07 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-06 08:45:04 -0600 Rating Details