Birdwatch Note
2024-12-31 23:27:33 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN - In the video linked via other notes, Kirk does not say that Alabama should have been in the playoff he simply said that Indiana should not have. Alabama may have been his choice but based on the video that is speculation and Community Notes are not for speculating. https://sports.yahoo.com/espns-kirk-herbstreit-indiana-was-not-a-team-that-should-have-been-on-that-field-vs-notre-dame-172223786.html
Written by 146382DA52802DA4A3AE4949F40D01AF0D375D1578EA5E10C4DD7E7B8023744E
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1874193580811858097
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1874235977817882989
- noteId - 1874235977817882989
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 146382DA52802DA4A3AE4949F40D01AF0D375D1578EA5E10C4DD7E7B8023744E
- createdAtMillis - 1735687653389
- tweetId - 1874193580811858097
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 1
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- NNN - In the video linked via other notes, Kirk does not say that Alabama should have been in the playoff he simply said that Indiana should not have. Alabama may have been his choice but based on the video that is speculation and Community Notes are not for speculating. https://sports.yahoo.com/espns-kirk-herbstreit-indiana-was-not-a-team-that-should-have-been-on-that-field-vs-notre-dame-172223786.html
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2025-01-01 09:54:30 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-01 07:31:39 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-01 04:10:52 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-01 00:35:52 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-01 00:22:14 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-01 00:01:22 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-31 23:23:11 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-31 22:28:39 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-31 22:14:16 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-31 21:15:20 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-31 21:15:01 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-31 20:18:14 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-31 20:16:24 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-31 19:31:10 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-31 19:25:28 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-31 18:59:29 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-31 18:46:59 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-31 18:25:56 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-31 18:20:03 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-02 12:53:30 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-01 10:08:00 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-01 08:16:44 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-31 23:04:23 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-31 22:16:15 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-31 19:09:48 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-31 17:47:42 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-01 19:23:08 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-01 09:24:25 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-01 07:43:43 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-01 06:32:42 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-01 00:47:36 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-01 00:45:36 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-31 19:34:11 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-31 19:18:39 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-31 18:29:08 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-31 18:23:54 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-31 17:50:55 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-31 17:46:16 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-31 17:39:04 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-31 17:34:00 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-01 10:39:07 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-01 06:49:48 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-01 04:57:55 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-01 00:08:48 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-31 23:04:08 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-31 23:00:30 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-31 21:50:31 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-31 21:27:46 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-31 19:57:16 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-31 18:58:31 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-31 17:44:43 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-01 13:25:30 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-01 12:04:49 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-01 00:44:06 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-31 20:31:05 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-31 20:28:45 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-31 19:39:27 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-31 19:21:03 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-31 19:15:52 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-31 18:32:28 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-31 17:45:44 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-31 17:39:44 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-31 17:37:48 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-01 00:24:03 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-31 22:23:15 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-31 22:07:12 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-31 20:39:00 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-31 20:26:29 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-31 19:39:17 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-31 19:35:52 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-31 19:30:55 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-31 19:18:03 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-31 18:38:43 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-31 18:08:45 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-31 17:46:08 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-31 17:44:01 -0600 | Rating Details |