Birdwatch Note
2024-12-31 04:18:32 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
判例に関するリプの応酬ですので、反論はリプでどうぞ。ノート不要。
Written by 57A85B5CA94CE024F501A196D0EFEA3225C77D7A19B85B58827C91B1B4912135
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1873698301167698259
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1873946816989061444
- noteId - 1873946816989061444
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 57A85B5CA94CE024F501A196D0EFEA3225C77D7A19B85B58827C91B1B4912135
- createdAtMillis - 1735618712076
- tweetId - 1873698301167698259
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- 判例に関するリプの応酬ですので、反論はリプでどうぞ。ノート不要。
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2025-01-01 08:01:43 -0600 | Rating Details |