Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-12-25 13:59:49 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

The links supplied to disprove the post are exactly the woke elements point of context. Wikipedia is left and extremely woke. https://dgardner.substack.com/p/has-wikipedia-become-wokepedia https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/wikipedia-conforms-to-wokeness/ https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/11/27/wikipedia-biased-bbc-how-left-took-platform/ https://whyevolutionistrue.com/2024/09/18/is-wikipedia-distorted-by-ideology-and-propaganda/

Written by 865B674C001EAE6203D3EEC88497396CF898FBA8555E9D88E7049C0BB326F046
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1871443771424116954

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1871918774737068342
  • noteId - 1871918774737068342
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 865B674C001EAE6203D3EEC88497396CF898FBA8555E9D88E7049C0BB326F046
  • createdAtMillis - 1735135189123
  • tweetId - 1871443771424116954
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 1
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • The links supplied to disprove the post are exactly the woke elements point of context. Wikipedia is left and extremely woke. https://dgardner.substack.com/p/has-wikipedia-become-wokepedia https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/wikipedia-conforms-to-wokeness/ https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/11/27/wikipedia-biased-bbc-how-left-took-platform/ https://whyevolutionistrue.com/2024/09/18/is-wikipedia-distorted-by-ideology-and-propaganda/

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-12-25 18:43:54 -0600 Rating Details
2024-12-25 12:48:03 -0600 Rating Details
2024-12-25 12:43:10 -0600 Rating Details
2024-12-25 12:01:10 -0600 Rating Details
2024-12-25 09:45:16 -0600 Rating Details
2024-12-25 09:21:04 -0600 Rating Details
2024-12-25 09:18:08 -0600 Rating Details
2024-12-25 08:24:13 -0600 Rating Details
2024-12-25 08:20:36 -0600 Rating Details
2024-12-27 03:24:40 -0600 Rating Details
2024-12-25 19:28:45 -0600 Rating Details
2024-12-25 14:46:40 -0600 Rating Details
2024-12-25 13:21:26 -0600 Rating Details
2024-12-25 12:50:10 -0600 Rating Details
2024-12-25 10:13:10 -0600 Rating Details
2024-12-25 10:08:51 -0600 Rating Details
2024-12-25 09:15:49 -0600 Rating Details
2024-12-25 09:13:00 -0600 Rating Details
2024-12-25 08:44:53 -0600 Rating Details
2024-12-25 08:20:32 -0600 Rating Details
2024-12-26 16:50:32 -0600 Rating Details
2024-12-25 18:42:16 -0600 Rating Details
2024-12-25 13:11:11 -0600 Rating Details
2024-12-25 12:53:41 -0600 Rating Details
2024-12-25 12:25:44 -0600 Rating Details
2024-12-25 12:06:27 -0600 Rating Details
2024-12-25 10:21:04 -0600 Rating Details
2024-12-25 09:41:44 -0600 Rating Details
2024-12-25 09:30:08 -0600 Rating Details
2024-12-25 08:30:07 -0600 Rating Details
2024-12-25 08:04:09 -0600 Rating Details
2024-12-26 07:05:41 -0600 Rating Details
2024-12-25 23:44:01 -0600 Rating Details
2024-12-25 20:35:20 -0600 Rating Details
2024-12-25 13:29:52 -0600 Rating Details
2024-12-25 12:43:55 -0600 Rating Details
2024-12-25 12:14:39 -0600 Rating Details
2024-12-25 11:59:42 -0600 Rating Details
2024-12-25 09:55:24 -0600 Rating Details
2024-12-25 08:56:37 -0600 Rating Details