Birdwatch Note
2024-12-24 13:14:36 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN — this is clearly the opinion of the OP. If you disagree with the comparison drawn, take it to the comments.
Written by 55646993D74D578289D03DCAB0D913B4FF35AEA71DF572941B42E5BAA09A6D64
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1871182808192098811
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1871545008278688085
- noteId - 1871545008278688085
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 55646993D74D578289D03DCAB0D913B4FF35AEA71DF572941B42E5BAA09A6D64
- createdAtMillis - 1735046076255
- tweetId - 1871182808192098811
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- NNN — this is clearly the opinion of the OP. If you disagree with the comparison drawn, take it to the comments.
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-12-24 18:55:01 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-24 13:26:48 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-24 13:09:08 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-25 10:44:28 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-28 06:02:45 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-24 10:39:32 -0600 | Rating Details |