Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-12-24 10:24:37 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

Another one, yes..Stake Ad https://t.co/8eHLC8waS8

Written by EAE7B8E74D3F0DF283CADB2AD9406060F916AEBA90E39C6E4A1073873A83CC76
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1871281917167075411

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1871502233352683612
  • noteId - 1871502233352683612
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - EAE7B8E74D3F0DF283CADB2AD9406060F916AEBA90E39C6E4A1073873A83CC76
  • createdAtMillis - 1735035877918
  • tweetId - 1871281917167075411
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 1
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Another one, yes..Stake Ad https://t.co/8eHLC8waS8

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-12-24 14:18:51 -0600 Rating Details
2024-12-24 08:52:53 -0600 Rating Details
2024-12-24 07:11:49 -0600 Rating Details
2024-12-24 04:44:40 -0600 Rating Details
2024-12-24 04:47:46 -0600 Rating Details
2024-12-24 11:57:19 -0600 Rating Details