Birdwatch Note
2024-12-18 18:14:53 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
I checked the link for Toronto that the previous noter linked and it's far less bad than Mississauga
Written by 6BCBBB5B835E34DB4C840B55D4E99F1A7350D5EF418D732032CB10AB7C1A002E
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1869094654542758058
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1869446249734431218
- noteId - 1869446249734431218
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 6BCBBB5B835E34DB4C840B55D4E99F1A7350D5EF418D732032CB10AB7C1A002E
- createdAtMillis - 1734545693225
- tweetId - 1869094654542758058
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- I checked the link for Toronto that the previous noter linked and it's far less bad than Mississauga
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-12-18 15:36:18 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-20 05:27:13 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-20 02:04:46 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-19 14:22:45 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-19 10:51:44 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-20 07:16:44 -0600 | Rating Details |