Birdwatch Note
2024-12-12 21:20:03 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
Note may be OK. The CNN article does state something similar, but most of the informants were there on their own volition.
Written by E11729FA10EBDB15453C640E7DC2873800A545503E2B6C921DDAF76530469BB7
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1867274001065635841
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1867318523795771881
- noteId - 1867318523795771881
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - E11729FA10EBDB15453C640E7DC2873800A545503E2B6C921DDAF76530469BB7
- createdAtMillis - 1734038403830
- tweetId - 1867274001065635841
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Note may be OK. The CNN article does state something similar, but most of the informants were there on their own volition.
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-12-12 16:05:51 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-12 15:59:16 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-12 15:50:46 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-13 14:35:53 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-13 11:18:53 -0600 | Rating Details |