Birdwatch Note
2024-12-12 17:26:54 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN - Clearly satirical, it includes the GROK watermark to prove it's AI so the note is unnecessary https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grok_(chatbot)
Written by 046FE37E9DD91C5A576A5603A3C3E02FF244D20AA25684563E82F6229C3A3155
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1867137280474837247
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1867259848875765956
- noteId - 1867259848875765956
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 046FE37E9DD91C5A576A5603A3C3E02FF244D20AA25684563E82F6229C3A3155
- createdAtMillis - 1734024414639
- tweetId - 1867137280474837247
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 1
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 1
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- NNN - Clearly satirical, it includes the GROK watermark to prove it's AI so the note is unnecessary https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grok_(chatbot)
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-12-12 13:46:05 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-12 11:47:59 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-13 02:59:48 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-12 14:54:10 -0600 | Rating Details |