Birdwatch Note
2024-12-08 19:21:06 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN - La note est suffisante sur le tweet de base, pas sur le QRT, l'auteur du tweet n'est pas au courant de ce fait et ne mérite donc pas la note.
Written by 92DC71B7F9ACAC6BA6D860FDE4805E5B9659974425DE1553EBB6D53C4A2EE89F
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1865684685143052494
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1865839035089899854
- noteId - 1865839035089899854
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 92DC71B7F9ACAC6BA6D860FDE4805E5B9659974425DE1553EBB6D53C4A2EE89F
- createdAtMillis - 1733685666235
- tweetId - 1865684685143052494
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- NNN - La note est suffisante sur le tweet de base, pas sur le QRT, l'auteur du tweet n'est pas au courant de ce fait et ne mérite donc pas la note.
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2024-12-08 15:31:45 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2024-12-08 15:27:32 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2024-12-08 13:47:15 -0600 | Rating Details |