Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-12-08 19:21:06 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

NNN - La note est suffisante sur le tweet de base, pas sur le QRT, l'auteur du tweet n'est pas au courant de ce fait et ne mérite donc pas la note.

Written by 92DC71B7F9ACAC6BA6D860FDE4805E5B9659974425DE1553EBB6D53C4A2EE89F
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1865684685143052494

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1865839035089899854
  • noteId - 1865839035089899854
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 92DC71B7F9ACAC6BA6D860FDE4805E5B9659974425DE1553EBB6D53C4A2EE89F
  • createdAtMillis - 1733685666235
  • tweetId - 1865684685143052494
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
  • trustworthySources - 0
  • summary
    • NNN - La note est suffisante sur le tweet de base, pas sur le QRT, l'auteur du tweet n'est pas au courant de ce fait et ne mérite donc pas la note.

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-12-08 15:31:45 -0600 Rating Details
2024-12-08 15:27:32 -0600 Rating Details
2024-12-08 13:47:15 -0600 Rating Details