Birdwatch Note
2024-12-08 03:27:48 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN - adding a note is just going to prove his point. And under CN rules, posts that were "correct when shared, but are out of date now" are considered not misleading and should not be noted
Written by C63B1A0B0826A8245BAC53200F268885A1EF7D14E0F403AE7E75020FB9D8FE40
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1865419803282083856
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1865599130594374076
- noteId - 1865599130594374076
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - C63B1A0B0826A8245BAC53200F268885A1EF7D14E0F403AE7E75020FB9D8FE40
- createdAtMillis - 1733628468546
- tweetId - 1865419803282083856
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 1
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- NNN - adding a note is just going to prove his point. And under CN rules, posts that were "correct when shared, but are out of date now" are considered not misleading and should not be noted
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2024-12-08 11:07:52 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2024-12-08 03:19:20 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2024-12-07 23:10:37 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2024-12-08 05:06:49 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2024-12-08 03:55:00 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2024-12-07 23:47:25 -0600 | Rating Details |