Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-12-05 18:35:00 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

This reply was blatantly stolen Original reply- https://x.com/geeperscreep3rs/status/1864685833204228434?s=46&t=Ctoy-_cjcw-meNXB6MVoRg

Written by DE7B47904EF28E2130CC1AAD4976189D120EAA16FF31C601DE2D3178BE02F325
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1864697767689400588

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1864740269393908155
  • noteId - 1864740269393908155
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - DE7B47904EF28E2130CC1AAD4976189D120EAA16FF31C601DE2D3178BE02F325
  • createdAtMillis - 1733423700080
  • tweetId - 1864697767689400588
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 1
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • This reply was blatantly stolen Original reply- https://x.com/geeperscreep3rs/status/1864685833204228434?s=46&t=Ctoy-_cjcw-meNXB6MVoRg

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-12-06 01:09:40 -0600 Rating Details
2024-12-05 21:53:08 -0600 Rating Details
2024-12-05 15:12:37 -0600 Rating Details
2024-12-05 14:13:26 -0600 Rating Details
2024-12-05 13:41:03 -0600 Rating Details
2024-12-05 13:28:11 -0600 Rating Details