Birdwatch Note
2024-12-04 16:28:03 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN - there is nothing requiring a CN in OP’s post. This is a political discussion. “Muzzling” is not a factual thing in this context, and very likely incorrect as other note points out
Written by C177B54745F53D87D03FF5CAF4DC738783CADAA10F4F8AFF806D3C8A07911913
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1864026966925463625
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1864345935125598413
- noteId - 1864345935125598413
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - C177B54745F53D87D03FF5CAF4DC738783CADAA10F4F8AFF806D3C8A07911913
- createdAtMillis - 1733329683463
- tweetId - 1864026966925463625
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- NNN - there is nothing requiring a CN in OP’s post. This is a political discussion. “Muzzling” is not a factual thing in this context, and very likely incorrect as other note points out
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-12-04 22:52:23 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-04 19:43:19 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-04 19:16:45 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-05 00:43:12 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-04 16:34:23 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-04 15:14:54 -0600 | Rating Details |