Birdwatch Note
2024-11-28 09:06:25 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN: the post didn’t claim scraping was involved. The screenshot clearly states the dataset was built using API
Written by 6C1F69CF2A47F3B233957313DD6995D6443304584082CAEA5D5949FF6863080B
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1861811964428579312
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1862060465439842693
- noteId - 1862060465439842693
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 6C1F69CF2A47F3B233957313DD6995D6443304584082CAEA5D5949FF6863080B
- createdAtMillis - 1732784785028
- tweetId - 1861811964428579312
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- NNN: the post didn’t claim scraping was involved. The screenshot clearly states the dataset was built using API
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-11-28 06:12:04 -0600 | Rating Details |