Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-11-28 07:37:31 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

NNN - under FPTP, the total number of votes received is not relevant. The previous CN should just be a comment to the OP.

Written by A43AE26166B30DA6236049A22704B213BA531BAE0E172B048E3E80E0F989F12A
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1861745195089338826

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1862038094041502149
  • noteId - 1862038094041502149
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - A43AE26166B30DA6236049A22704B213BA531BAE0E172B048E3E80E0F989F12A
  • createdAtMillis - 1732779451272
  • tweetId - 1861745195089338826
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
  • trustworthySources - 0
  • summary
    • NNN - under FPTP, the total number of votes received is not relevant. The previous CN should just be a comment to the OP.

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-11-28 02:53:37 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-28 02:20:55 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-28 03:20:01 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-28 02:00:34 -0600 Rating Details