Birdwatch Note
2024-11-28 04:32:14 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN. The proposed note belongs in the comments. There's nothing factually incorrect or misleading in the posted article.
Written by 54E5FE3BB8C9DBE2953CC7D5EF836E736D495E41E342E4FE569FA9724D7D9931
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1861798976439169363
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1861991465611927727
- noteId - 1861991465611927727
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 54E5FE3BB8C9DBE2953CC7D5EF836E736D495E41E342E4FE569FA9724D7D9931
- createdAtMillis - 1732768334187
- tweetId - 1861798976439169363
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- NNN. The proposed note belongs in the comments. There's nothing factually incorrect or misleading in the posted article.
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2024-11-28 06:59:48 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2024-11-28 06:12:41 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2024-11-28 05:37:48 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2024-11-28 05:31:50 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2024-11-27 23:05:16 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2024-11-28 09:25:55 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2024-11-28 09:18:54 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2024-11-28 06:39:22 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2024-11-28 05:36:16 -0600 | Rating Details |