Birdwatch Note
2024-11-26 04:29:20 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
The post claims are completely fictional initial cost is comparable to renewable energy 2000/3000pkw.https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economics_of_nuclear_power_plants Due to the much longer lifespan of nuclear and the ability to provide a constant baseline of electricity, nuclear is not only cheaper as a whole, but better for the environment.
Written by D7E9E9C1E39B4A4F1757A28B291FA7D670C444010C82357B77D46D0021533E29
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1861215932267536541
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1861265963444019266
- noteId - 1861265963444019266
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - D7E9E9C1E39B4A4F1757A28B291FA7D670C444010C82357B77D46D0021533E29
- createdAtMillis - 1732595360991
- tweetId - 1861215932267536541
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 1
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- The post claims are completely fictional initial cost is comparable to renewable energy 2000/3000pkw.https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economics_of_nuclear_power_plants Due to the much longer lifespan of nuclear and the ability to provide a constant baseline of electricity, nuclear is not only cheaper as a whole, but better for the environment.
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-11-28 12:20:36 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-28 11:09:00 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-28 10:54:40 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-27 19:03:12 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-27 17:28:34 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-27 17:15:12 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-27 16:16:43 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-27 15:52:17 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-27 15:47:52 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-27 14:29:34 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-27 03:37:48 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-26 20:48:03 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-26 17:19:49 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-26 17:12:02 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-26 17:00:42 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-26 16:12:54 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-26 06:36:28 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-26 05:23:44 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-26 05:22:33 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-26 05:01:18 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-26 01:46:51 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-26 00:41:35 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-26 00:27:55 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-26 00:27:06 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-26 00:23:08 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-26 00:14:54 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-25 23:25:43 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-25 23:12:40 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-25 23:05:41 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-25 22:44:28 -0600 | Rating Details |