Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-11-26 00:27:58 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

NNN- This was a question. Rhetorical or not, personal opinions as a result of it shouldn’t be in the notes.

Written by A56309AAC5E5D92C1E849C5A5E63D4D74BAA5C0C7365755882AEF5B0AD128BC4
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1860497526769561668

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1861205217766777023
  • noteId - 1861205217766777023
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - A56309AAC5E5D92C1E849C5A5E63D4D74BAA5C0C7365755882AEF5B0AD128BC4
  • createdAtMillis - 1732580878093
  • tweetId - 1860497526769561668
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 1
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • NNN- This was a question. Rhetorical or not, personal opinions as a result of it shouldn’t be in the notes.

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-11-26 08:05:53 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-27 23:01:33 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-25 19:26:52 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-25 19:15:17 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-25 18:38:46 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-25 21:21:51 -0600 Rating Details