Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-11-24 07:25:04 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

The CIA did not admit remote viewing is real. Documents show the CIA experimented with remote viewing as a way to gather intelligence information, but the resulting information was “inconsistent”, “inaccurate”, and “required substancial subjective interpretation”. https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP96-00791R000200180005-5.pdf

Written by 2F9100CB3434160453E8FF7AE76E33CF7EB7F910D55F43BCB1201DBCCA5D1CCB
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1860446985293017513

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1860585412437127379
  • noteId - 1860585412437127379
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 2F9100CB3434160453E8FF7AE76E33CF7EB7F910D55F43BCB1201DBCCA5D1CCB
  • createdAtMillis - 1732433104987
  • tweetId - 1860446985293017513
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • The CIA did not admit remote viewing is real. Documents show the CIA experimented with remote viewing as a way to gather intelligence information, but the resulting information was “inconsistent”, “inaccurate”, and “required substancial subjective interpretation”. https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP96-00791R000200180005-5.pdf

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-11-25 07:31:16 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-25 02:29:24 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-24 18:44:01 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-24 17:06:28 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-24 14:42:29 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-24 13:59:32 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-24 13:33:04 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-24 11:54:16 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-24 09:42:42 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-24 08:29:06 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-24 08:25:49 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-24 08:11:00 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-24 06:48:08 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-24 05:51:19 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-24 02:33:12 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-24 01:48:05 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-25 15:16:47 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-24 14:00:16 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-24 12:46:27 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-24 12:39:05 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-24 10:20:14 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-24 09:06:03 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-24 08:45:25 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-24 07:07:03 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-24 01:58:58 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-24 01:45:59 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-24 01:38:23 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-24 01:32:37 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-24 16:09:10 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-24 14:19:49 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-24 14:11:34 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-24 13:09:04 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-24 11:54:01 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-24 11:31:42 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-24 11:22:54 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-24 11:01:47 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-24 06:18:56 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-24 03:05:06 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-24 03:00:54 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-24 14:31:31 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-24 12:20:59 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-24 11:06:11 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-24 10:38:13 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-24 08:16:53 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-24 07:35:41 -0600 Rating Details
2025-02-20 19:09:51 -0600 Rating Details