Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-11-22 20:27:48 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

This is a personal experience . Same as Jeff’s. There are comments for a reason, everyone can read Jeff’s version. No need for a note.

Written by D656FF598EB90ECA56A9897F8F5D78D4DB458386FBA426B4E3FC1B5ED0A1E67A
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1859483544612913376

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1860057615482372487
  • noteId - 1860057615482372487
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - D656FF598EB90ECA56A9897F8F5D78D4DB458386FBA426B4E3FC1B5ED0A1E67A
  • createdAtMillis - 1732307268387
  • tweetId - 1859483544612913376
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
  • trustworthySources - 0
  • summary
    • This is a personal experience . Same as Jeff’s. There are comments for a reason, everyone can read Jeff’s version. No need for a note.

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-11-24 08:12:53 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-23 08:57:48 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-23 07:17:34 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-23 06:52:18 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-22 23:24:25 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-22 17:59:18 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-22 14:54:47 -0600 Rating Details