Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-11-21 14:12:27 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

NNN: The second half of the proposed note is an opinion and should be put in the replies instead

Written by 73228CA95AC5A8DE0029C00747DAB961651BE71297F1F6AAA9417FBEF7DC34DE
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1858933815898763683

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1859600769881911673
  • noteId - 1859600769881911673
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 73228CA95AC5A8DE0029C00747DAB961651BE71297F1F6AAA9417FBEF7DC34DE
  • createdAtMillis - 1732198347909
  • tweetId - 1858933815898763683
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
  • trustworthySources - 0
  • summary
    • NNN: The second half of the proposed note is an opinion and should be put in the replies instead

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-11-21 10:15:12 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-21 10:02:37 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-21 08:36:32 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-21 08:32:42 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-21 11:37:01 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-21 08:37:07 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-21 08:27:02 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-21 13:08:45 -0600 Rating Details