Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-11-21 00:41:23 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

NNN - The post provides two speculative opinions about the future tied to a clearly real event that occurred in the past. There's nothing misleading here.

Written by 18211BE0EF71E6893E30BDCF569EA8E36270F0905F1BDA1CD2C049DDC52946E8
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1859265887271866504

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1859396655511965859
  • noteId - 1859396655511965859
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 18211BE0EF71E6893E30BDCF569EA8E36270F0905F1BDA1CD2C049DDC52946E8
  • createdAtMillis - 1732149683250
  • tweetId - 1859265887271866504
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
  • trustworthySources - 0
  • summary
    • NNN - The post provides two speculative opinions about the future tied to a clearly real event that occurred in the past. There's nothing misleading here.

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-12-01 03:21:06 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-20 19:07:39 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-21 10:42:20 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-21 10:19:46 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-21 05:36:22 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-20 19:22:09 -0600 Rating Details