Birdwatch Note
2024-11-19 11:46:51 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN - The proposed CN is a straw man argument. The OP does not make the claim that the CN attempts to refute.
Written by 4ECDF45990509CDB36E650108A94F759E993C78630FE1362AF86792E8D4E24DA
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1858675997303775553
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1858839351104290908
- noteId - 1858839351104290908
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 4ECDF45990509CDB36E650108A94F759E993C78630FE1362AF86792E8D4E24DA
- createdAtMillis - 1732016811525
- tweetId - 1858675997303775553
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- NNN - The proposed CN is a straw man argument. The OP does not make the claim that the CN attempts to refute.
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-11-19 07:03:39 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-19 07:24:53 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-19 07:06:41 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-19 05:54:23 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-20 00:31:01 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-19 07:34:42 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-19 06:35:13 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-19 13:03:58 -0600 | Rating Details |