Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-11-16 20:09:18 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

Jake didn't say it was his opinion, therefore it could be misunderstood as fact. While controversial, Community Notes is indeed needed to ensure it's not taken as a fact based on the results of the fight. https://www.espn.com/boxing/story/_/id/42417518/katie-taylor-edges-amanda-serrano-controversial-decision

Written by 6263E13217142EBBB52529DA212C405A0AF181D06DC9F00A1EC7F8CE0C2F44AF
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1857699607360180550

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1857878633450201117
  • noteId - 1857878633450201117
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 6263E13217142EBBB52529DA212C405A0AF181D06DC9F00A1EC7F8CE0C2F44AF
  • createdAtMillis - 1731787758587
  • tweetId - 1857699607360180550
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Jake didn't say it was his opinion, therefore it could be misunderstood as fact. While controversial, Community Notes is indeed needed to ensure it's not taken as a fact based on the results of the fight. https://www.espn.com/boxing/story/_/id/42417518/katie-taylor-edges-amanda-serrano-controversial-decision

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-11-16 18:47:16 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-16 17:18:23 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-16 15:51:50 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-16 15:37:34 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-16 14:44:28 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-16 14:30:36 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-16 14:20:27 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-17 07:59:15 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-17 07:08:11 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-17 04:06:09 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-17 03:58:40 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-17 03:27:40 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-17 00:05:12 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-16 21:16:32 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-16 21:16:12 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-16 21:14:04 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-16 19:21:31 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-16 18:25:55 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-16 17:57:43 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-16 17:00:46 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-16 16:36:06 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-16 16:01:35 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-16 18:17:38 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-16 17:58:47 -0600 Rating Details