Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-11-14 12:19:37 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

Efectivamente en el debate hubo agresiĆ³n verbal cuando se cuestiono la cifra de falsos positivos. La cifra se cuestiona dado que la JEP dice que es provisional por cuece de reportes de varias fuentes. Fuente: https://www.lasillavacia.com/silla-nacional/asi-llego-la-jep-a-la-cifra-de-6402-victimas-de-falsos-positivos/

Written by 9247A901813AE26DE7B0B5098B62C32AD585E192D21C5FA4C087C7FAB5C48FD0
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1856829643489259885

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1857035656754520150
  • noteId - 1857035656754520150
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 9247A901813AE26DE7B0B5098B62C32AD585E192D21C5FA4C087C7FAB5C48FD0
  • createdAtMillis - 1731586777281
  • tweetId - 1856829643489259885
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Efectivamente en el debate hubo agresiĆ³n verbal cuando se cuestiono la cifra de falsos positivos. La cifra se cuestiona dado que la JEP dice que es provisional por cuece de reportes de varias fuentes. Fuente: https://www.lasillavacia.com/silla-nacional/asi-llego-la-jep-a-la-cifra-de-6402-victimas-de-falsos-positivos/

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-11-14 15:41:31 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-14 13:58:57 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-14 13:01:28 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-14 12:29:12 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-14 12:05:27 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-14 09:28:41 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-14 09:07:59 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-14 08:31:49 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-14 07:55:22 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-14 07:38:32 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-14 06:29:40 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-16 15:25:42 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-15 22:40:21 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-15 18:16:25 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-15 07:17:01 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-14 13:30:37 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-14 13:09:52 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-14 07:46:32 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-18 07:19:14 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-14 17:38:45 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-14 15:22:24 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-14 13:53:54 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-14 09:34:34 -0600 Rating Details