Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-11-14 07:18:42 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

Dat Karim eerder zou zijn vervolgd is geen bewijs dat zijn huidige zaak tegen Rutte niet deugd. Personen in diskrediet brengen kan in de comments

Written by 44EBF8D9F1B5F4FEACB18732C43796EA818787C93490F4015B2454593554FCB1
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1856618419837079562

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1856959930978251053
  • noteId - 1856959930978251053
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 44EBF8D9F1B5F4FEACB18732C43796EA818787C93490F4015B2454593554FCB1
  • createdAtMillis - 1731568722849
  • tweetId - 1856618419837079562
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 1
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 0
  • summary
    • Dat Karim eerder zou zijn vervolgd is geen bewijs dat zijn huidige zaak tegen Rutte niet deugd. Personen in diskrediet brengen kan in de comments

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-11-14 15:45:08 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-14 15:33:48 -0600 Rating Details