Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-11-13 21:16:36 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

Actually, Ricochet did indeed post some of these but they were deleted.

Written by FD4F1AAF9D54E450DBA897453ABED3347DE4C1365DCA8C7EE42D04506EEDC786
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1856611267038880078

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1856808407820628388
  • noteId - 1856808407820628388
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - FD4F1AAF9D54E450DBA897453ABED3347DE4C1365DCA8C7EE42D04506EEDC786
  • createdAtMillis - 1731532596914
  • tweetId - 1856611267038880078
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 1
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 0
  • summary
    • Actually, Ricochet did indeed post some of these but they were deleted.

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-11-14 15:15:19 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-13 20:49:16 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-13 17:22:32 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-13 20:00:35 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-14 10:10:46 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-14 03:53:50 -0600 Rating Details