Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-11-12 17:29:42 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

El artículo enlazado en la nota no contradice a la autora del post, puesto que ella habla del consumo de agua, no de la huella de carbono.

Written by 623F2DE4B53C84D8254967CFFBE0F670CC41F8871C7E7507259C19F79740CFF3
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1855875137964257479

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1856388917081104595
  • noteId - 1856388917081104595
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 623F2DE4B53C84D8254967CFFBE0F670CC41F8871C7E7507259C19F79740CFF3
  • createdAtMillis - 1731432582527
  • tweetId - 1855875137964257479
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • El artículo enlazado en la nota no contradice a la autora del post, puesto que ella habla del consumo de agua, no de la huella de carbono.

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-11-12 12:19:19 -0600 Rating Details