Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-11-12 08:32:03 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

NNN- It clearly expresses OP's opinion. Go CN the replied post. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/opinion

Written by 37B1D606F9902F8C7234C4AC10758832F4D132D303A928DD2D3B8EA47D5A2C3F
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1855940063693070756

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1856253613242286305
  • noteId - 1856253613242286305
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 37B1D606F9902F8C7234C4AC10758832F4D132D303A928DD2D3B8EA47D5A2C3F
  • createdAtMillis - 1731400323579
  • tweetId - 1855940063693070756
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • NNN- It clearly expresses OP's opinion. Go CN the replied post. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/opinion

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-11-12 16:27:59 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-12 14:31:33 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-12 06:01:19 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-12 04:51:29 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-12 02:42:16 -0600 Rating Details