Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-11-10 17:50:58 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

NNN - Please keep opinions in the comment section. Whether or not there is a correlation is clearly conjecture and thusly should not be a CN. Please don't abuse CN.

Written by F2EBDBE6F2AD2B57CBF467A52A51422F679AE5E33F3C966DA6DC0FBE532F1F52
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1855359712415424855

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1855669493369897244
  • noteId - 1855669493369897244
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - F2EBDBE6F2AD2B57CBF467A52A51422F679AE5E33F3C966DA6DC0FBE532F1F52
  • createdAtMillis - 1731261058548
  • tweetId - 1855359712415424855
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • NNN - Please keep opinions in the comment section. Whether or not there is a correlation is clearly conjecture and thusly should not be a CN. Please don't abuse CN.

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-11-10 11:57:26 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-11 00:41:14 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-10 12:16:37 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-10 12:01:16 -0600 Rating Details