Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-11-08 04:33:28 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

NNN The proposed Community Note might be true, but the comment belongs in the replies to the OP. Opinion is apparent, and humorously supported.

Written by B05598E79F2728659C9DB58BBFC85CBED74C9103389B837C2B3D3D7A88287F96
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1854170875206975796

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1854744020309667929
  • noteId - 1854744020309667929
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - B05598E79F2728659C9DB58BBFC85CBED74C9103389B837C2B3D3D7A88287F96
  • createdAtMillis - 1731040408576
  • tweetId - 1854170875206975796
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 1
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 1
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
  • trustworthySources - 0
  • summary
    • NNN The proposed Community Note might be true, but the comment belongs in the replies to the OP. Opinion is apparent, and humorously supported.

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-11-08 13:44:22 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-08 07:48:12 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-08 07:35:36 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-09 02:00:41 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-22 17:27:53 -0600 Rating Details