Birdwatch Note
2024-11-05 23:40:29 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
Number refers to people registered and affiliated with a party who has voted, not the actual votes.
Written by DBBAEF91402ECECE6DFBBB4F8AFBBE98CC03D46220F7615C9E71B3C62E105A42
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1853838112671301893
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1853945511478477253
- noteId - 1853945511478477253
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - DBBAEF91402ECECE6DFBBB4F8AFBBE98CC03D46220F7615C9E71B3C62E105A42
- createdAtMillis - 1730850029235
- tweetId - 1853838112671301893
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- Number refers to people registered and affiliated with a party who has voted, not the actual votes.
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2024-11-05 19:35:31 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2024-11-05 18:32:54 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2024-11-05 20:41:17 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2024-11-05 20:07:03 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2024-11-05 18:51:27 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2024-11-05 18:35:29 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2024-11-05 17:48:55 -0600 | Rating Details |