Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-11-05 16:35:02 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

NNN - This is clearly satire, plus the account doesn't have a checkmark, so there's no reason to engagement farm.

Written by BF60D971647A36AA263995D67315A8420F4E43B12D45A43D7DA5C2EBDDF00F63
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1853616481940193595

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1853838442876276874
  • noteId - 1853838442876276874
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - BF60D971647A36AA263995D67315A8420F4E43B12D45A43D7DA5C2EBDDF00F63
  • createdAtMillis - 1730824502091
  • tweetId - 1853616481940193595
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 1
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 0
  • summary
    • NNN - This is clearly satire, plus the account doesn't have a checkmark, so there's no reason to engagement farm.

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-11-05 17:07:33 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-05 11:12:58 -0600 Rating Details