Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-11-05 12:47:36 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

NNN. Es una opinión, como lo es la de la nota propuesta. Para eso están las respuestas, no la notas.

Written by E94E0F61471FD95E2EDA1D436340D429137595EEBECA33B6B0F814C83015C6B5
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1853551409163067541

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1853781207705956467
  • noteId - 1853781207705956467
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - E94E0F61471FD95E2EDA1D436340D429137595EEBECA33B6B0F814C83015C6B5
  • createdAtMillis - 1730810856163
  • tweetId - 1853551409163067541
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
  • trustworthySources - 0
  • summary
    • NNN. Es una opinión, como lo es la de la nota propuesta. Para eso están las respuestas, no la notas.

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-11-06 03:51:03 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-05 22:17:38 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-05 20:19:36 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-05 06:55:34 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-06 01:11:09 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-05 20:34:13 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-06 18:54:07 -0600 Rating Details
2024-11-05 15:41:17 -0600 Rating Details