Birdwatch Note
2024-11-04 23:46:54 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
No need for note as the claim mentioned in tweet is factually correct.
Written by 6E92BF217CE7D27D2C5FA0F540A46CF0F3C7702089B9BE0039AD211A89AC3C14
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1853290638944485657
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1853584738319290671
- noteId - 1853584738319290671
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 6E92BF217CE7D27D2C5FA0F540A46CF0F3C7702089B9BE0039AD211A89AC3C14
- createdAtMillis - 1730764014211
- tweetId - 1853290638944485657
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- No need for note as the claim mentioned in tweet is factually correct.
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-11-05 06:56:48 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-05 00:29:05 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-05 10:10:50 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-04 18:13:12 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-04 21:22:43 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-04 18:44:21 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-11-04 18:23:31 -0600 | Rating Details |